Reply

Old 07-16-2007, 11:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
Sparky
Administrator
Administrator Rank
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 980
Credits: 94,947.68
Sparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond reputeSparky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Wigan's salary cap hearing moved

The hearing into charges that Wigan broke the Super League salary cap will now take place on Wednesday, 25 July.
It had originally been scheduled to take place on Monday, 16 July but has been moved to give the Warriors more time to prepare their case.

Wigan, St Helens and Bradford were all charged with spending more than the permitted 50% of their income on players' wages in the 2006 season.

Bradford have already been docked two points and Saints fined £22,000.

And the same three-man independent panel will hear Wigan's defence.

Wigan requested more time after claiming they were unable to fully prepare their case until the outcome of a preliminary hearing.

The preliminary hearing was held to determine whether any penalties imposed should be in accordance with the rules in place in 2006 or an amended version introduced for this year.

The Warriors managed to persuade the Rugby Football League to use last year's set of rules at a two-hour meeting with the tribunal panel on Thursday.

And Wigan chairman Maurice Lindsay said: "The panel were extremely fair and we are obviously pleased and relieved that they found in our favour."

Bradford were fined two points for going 4% over the limit and Saints handed their cash punishment for going over the limit by a smaller amount.

Saints' offence is believed to relate to bonuses given to James Graham and Ade Gardner for Great Britain call-ups.

A Saints club statement said they "agree with and accept the penalty," £4,000 of which was a suspended fine from 2005.

"The club considers the quantum of the breach to have been very minor and to have been with mitigating factors."

A statement from Bradford expressed "general satisfaction" with the panel's "appropriate" decision and punishment.

This year, clubs have voted to double the maximum penalty from a six-point deduction to 12 points, depending on the seriousness of the breach.
Sparky is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios